Aug. 24, 2009
The Hurt Locker
.jpg)
They don’t make war movies the way they used to, and I don’t mean because Quentin Tarantino’s emotional development froze at the age of 15. I’m talking about non-ironic war movies where you’re actually supposed to feel something when people die, and the characters speak and act like real human beings trapped in a dreadful situation. What I’m saying is, they don’t make war the way they used to, and, if you’re dealing in post-Vietnam skirmishes, that considerably alters the genre.
Sure, combat is combat, tragic death remains tragic death, and there’s still too many strong, young people getting taken apart by mortars and high-powered rifles in Iraq and Afghanistan. But John Wayne, and even Martin Sheen, didn’t have to worry about getting blown to bits by some guy holding a fucking cell phone. And Wayne and Sheen didn’t have the option of sending in a remote-controlled robot to try to dismantle an explosive.
Much of the impact of Kathryn Bigelow’s frequently nerve-jangling movie, “The Hurt Locker,” arises from just how quickly a situation can change from slightly removed business-as-usual to utter horror for modern combat soldiers. And technology, more often than not, serves as the hair-trigger into hell.
The movie, which is set in Iraq, also benefits from the added texture of watching a war film at a time when that war is still being fought. This isn’t a propaganda picture, and it’s not a hindsight-steeped post-mortem like “The Deer Hunter” and “Apocalypse Now.” Real men and women continue to experience the choking tension that Bigelow bluntly illustrates in this picture's best sequences, and it seems almost impossible that they can bear it and come back psychologically whole.
***
.jpg)
The genuinely radical departure of Mark Boal’s screenplay, though, is that its central protagonist, a bomb defusing expert named Staff Sgt. James (Jeremy Renner), is addicted to the adrenaline rush of life or death situations, and doesn’t much care if he puts the rest of his squad in harm’s way while he gets his rocks off. The closer he gets to being killed, the more fun he's having. So he always makes sure he almost gets killed.
James is hardly what you would call an honorable warrior, even though as the film progresses there are (not completely effective) stabs at humanizing him. He’s a selfish bastard who sometimes giggles giddily at the knowledge that he’s unnerving his supposed brothers in arms while he takes insane risks; at one point, he even strips off his protective bomb gear because he figures if he's going to die, he wants to die comfortably. You can’t help siding with one of his squad members, Sgt. J.T. Sanborn (Anthony Mackie), when Sanborn considers blowing the asshole to kingdom come as they detonate some confiscated bombs.
In this generous 8-minute clip - it's the first scene in the film - we see why James has suddenly been transferred to this particular squad (Note that the soldier whose place he takes is played, in an effective cameo, by Guy Pearce. Ralph Fiennes also shows up as a mercenary for several harrowing minutes later in the film.):
I’m not a big fan of the omnipresent shaky-cam in post-millennium filmmaking. In fact, I usually loathe it, because it’s too often motivated by a director’s need to seem hip, regardless of whether or not a sequence really calls for the technique. But Bigelow and her cinematographer, Barry Ackroyd, rattle the images in “The Hurt Locker” to convey how a soldier’s attention has to constantly dart from one area to another to keep a literally explosive situation from getting out of hand.
The sudden visual clarity of the blast itself is also a brilliant move; surely such moments must fall into deep focus. Throw in the complicated sound mix, with life going on beyond the frame even as these soldiers are putting their asses to the fire, and this is a first-rate piece of filmmaking.
Frankly, I never imagined Bigelow, who has always struck me as little more than competent, could be capable of something so emotionally and physically precise. This isn't "Blue Steel" with Jamie Lee Curtis, that's for sure. Or, God forbid, "Point Break" with Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze.
***
The cast as a whole is solid, although the script doesn’t do Renner many favors. It’s hard to tell what the hell we’re supposed to think of Sgt. James during a long stretch of the second act when he becomes obsessed with a young Iraqi street vendor who sells him bootlegged dvd’s; a moment involving the kid that’s supposed to be powerful is really just confusing, and contains the only genuinely gratuitous blood and guts in the film. There’s also a platitude-spewing Army psychologist (Christian Camargo) who’s so absurdly naïve, you start thinking it can’t be too long before this dumb fuck gets blown to hell. And, sure enough, he gets it good.
.jpg)
Renner is receiving all the press for his performance here, and I won’t deny he has his moments. But I think the real acting find in “The Hurt Locker” is Mackie. His Sgt. Sanborn is as levelheaded as James is reckless, so he’s the character you tend to latch onto.
There’s not any theatricality to Sanborn; there’s nothing of a comic book about him. Mackie is believable both when he wants to embrace Renner and when he wants to see him dead. That’s a lot of ground to cover, and not an easy thing to pull off when you hang somewhat in the shadows of the main storyline. Mackie makes every minute of his screen time count.
Regardless of who generates more ink, Renner and Mackie are assured of big screen careers once Hollywood digests this one. But they can only hope for future directors who are as committed to their material as Bigelow is to "The Hurt Locker." Next February, she’ll almost certainly become one of the rare female filmmakers to receive an Oscar nomination for best director. Although she loses grip of "The Hurt Locker"'s otherwise taut story line for several strange minutes, she fully deserves the nod.
”The Hurt Locker" is violent, of course, but the carnage is mostly conveyed via explosions and the sickening "thwap" of bullets hitting flesh. As I mentioned earlier, there’s one sequence that seems out of place because it features so much intestine, but it’s over before you know it. Lots of profanity. Rated R. 127 minutes, which is about 10-15 minutes too long for its own good.